One widely used approach to managerial appraisal is the system of evaluating managerial performance against the setting and accomplishing of verifiable objectives. Corporate performance management software plays a pivotal role in this regard. This is simple logic, since people cannot be expected to accomplish a task with effectiveness or efficiency unless they know what the end points of their efforts should be. Nor can any organized enterprise in business or elsewhere be expected to do so.
Once a program of managing by verifiable objectives is operating, appraisal is a fairly easy step. Supervisors determine how well managers set objectives and how well they have performed against them. In cases where appraisal by results has failed or been disillusioning, the principal reason is that managing by objectives was seen only as an appraisal technique. The system is not likely to work if used only for this purpose.
Management by objectives must be a way of managing, a way of planning and a key to organizing, staffing, leading and controlling. When this is the case, appraisal boils down to whether or not managers have established adequate but reasonably attainable objectives and how they have performed against them in a certain period.
There are other questions too, when using corporate performance management software. Were the goals adequate? Did they call for stretched (high but reasonable) performance? These questions can be answered only through the judgment and experience of a person’s superior, although this judgment can become sharper with time and experience, and it may be even more objective if the superior can use the goals of other managers in similar positions for comparison.
In assessing the accomplishment of goals, the evaluator must take into account such considerations as whether the goals were reasonably attainable in the first place, whether factors beyond a person’s control unduly helped or hindered in accomplishing goals, and what the reasons for the results were. The reviewer should also note whether an individual continued to operate against obsolete goals when situations changed and revised goals were called for.
Related Articles of Interest :
-
Corporate Performance Management Solutions
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
The appraisal should measure performance in accomplishing goals, plans and performance, in regards to corporate performance management. No one wants a person in a managerial role who appears to do everything right as a manager but who cannot turn in a good record of profit...
-
Corporate Performance Management 101
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
Evaluating the performance of people, groups, and organizations is an ordinary practice of all societies. In some cases, the appraisal processes are planned and officially sanctioned. On the other hand, they may be an informal and essential part of everyday activities. Corporate performance management forms...
-
Type Of Performance Appraisals
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
Managers have for many years been evaluated against standards of personal traits and work characteristic. Typical trait-rating evaluation systems may list ten to fifteen personal characteristics, such as ability to get along with people, leadership, analytical competence and initiative. The list may also include such...
-
Performance Appraisal Software
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
Managers have long been reluctant to appraise subordinates. However, in an activity as important as managing, there should be no reluctance to measure performance as accurately as possible. In almost all kinds of group enterprises, whether in work or in play, performance is rated in...
-
Performance Management Software
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
Managers, like everyone else, want their performance positively appraised. They seek approval. Even if individual managers have full freedom to act in accordance with the currently conceived social responsibilities, they might not do so because of standards applied in evaluating their performance. That’s where the...
-
Types Of Performance Appraisals
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
In some cases, the performance appraisal processes are structured and formally sanctioned while in other cases they are an informal and essential part of daily activities. Performance refers to the extent of completion of the tasks that make up an individual’s job. One type of...
-
Corporate Performance Management
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
Appraising the performance of individuals, group and organizations is a common practice of all societies. While in some instances the appraisal processes are structured and formally sanctioned, in other instances they are an informal and integral part of daily activities. Corporate performance management has sometimes...
-
Performance Appraisal Training
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
After the performance of an employee is appraised, the superior should inform the employee about the level of the employee’s performance, the reason for the need for improvement of performance, and the methods of this improvement. The superior should counsel the employee about his performance...
-
Corporate Performance Evaluations
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
For many years, managers have been evaluated against standards of personal traits and work characteristics. Typical trait-rating evaluation systems may list ten to fifteen personal characteristics, such as ability to get along with people, leadership, analytical competence, judgment and initiative. The list may also include...
-
Sales Performance Management
10 August 2010 8:30 PM |
No Comments
Sales management is an integral sub-system of marketing management. It translates the marketing plan into marketing performance. Sales management is hence described as the muscle behind marketing management. The sales manager in a modern organization holds a multitude of responsibilities. He has to plan, direct...